I don’t think there should necessarily be a federal policy in this area. I think different states are likely to come to differentĬonclusions, and that’s appropriate. It’s really no one else’s business, in terms of trying to regulate or prohibit behavior in that regard. “People should be free to enter into any kind of relationship they want to enter into. People should be free to enter into any kind of relationship Source: Todd Dvorak, Associated Press Writer in SF Chronicle Cheney commented: “My own preference is as I’ve stated, but the president makes policy for the administration.” The states have made thatįundamental decision of what constitutes a marriage,” he said.īush backs a constitutional amendment prohibiting gay marriage. “The question that comes up with the issue of marriage is what kind of official sanction or approval is going to be granted by government? Historically, that’s been a relationship that has been handled by the states. People ought to be free to enter into any kind of relationship they want to. “With the respect to the question of relationships, my general view is freedom means freedom for everyone. Vice President Dick Cheney, whose daughter Mary is a lesbian, distanced himself from President Bush’s call for a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage “Lynne and I have a gay daughter, so it’s an issue our family is very familiar with,”Ĭheney told an audience that included his daughter. “Freedom means freedom for everyone,” including gays Source: Edwards-Cheney debate: 2004 Vice Presidential Bush felt that it was important to make it clear that that’s the wrong way to go, as far as he’s concerned. We had the Massachusetts Supreme Court direct the legislature of Massachusetts to modify their constitution to allow gay marriage. In effect, what’s happened is that in recent months, especially in Massachusetts, but also in California, but in Massachusetts States have regulated marriage, if you will. Traditionally, that’s been an issue for the states. Then your administration’s support for a constitutional ban on same-sex unions?Ī: That’s a separate question from the issue of whether or not government should sanction or approve or give some sort of authorization, if you will, to these relationships And you used your family’s experience as a context for your remarks. Q: You said four years ago at this very setting: “Freedom means freedom for everybody.” You said it again recently when you were asked about legalizing same-sex unions. Gay marriage should be an issue for the states Members of the Christian right, where Cheney drew lots of support, might quote biblical passages that seem to argue against homosexuality. The line was so thin it had virtually ceased to exist. Some no doubt would contrast this with his own opposition to gays in the military.Īnd private lives of presidential candidates. It seemed unfair that his whole family tree would become subject to an in-depth examination and discussion in the media. A relative was gay.Ĭheney worried that this would make the newspapers, become part of the endless scrutiny. Was he prepared to sacrifice everything during the next two years for that one goal and objective? Cheney wasn't sure. Vice President of the United States under George W.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |